Business Ethics • Deep Flashcard Hub
The goal is not just to memorize terms, but to be able to walk through a dilemma, name the stakeholders, apply at least one framework, and justify the best decision using clear ethical language.
OA-focused
Concepts & frameworks
Scenario decision practice
Study mode = see question + answer.
Test mode = questions only; tap a card to reveal.
Course Concept Map
Big picture
You can see Business Ethics as three layers:
  • 1. Concepts: ethics, values, morals, stakeholder theory, CSR, codes of conduct.
  • 2. Frameworks: utilitarian, rights-based, justice/fairness, virtue ethics, common good.
  • 3. Application: real dilemmas, conflicts of interest, whistleblowing, HR issues, safety, sustainability.
On the OA, most questions are just “Which decision aligns with which principle?” or “Which action is most ethical for these stakeholders?”
Core Principles & Tools
Must-know list
Aim to be able to explain each of these in 1–2 sentences:
Ethics vs. law vs. company policy
Stakeholder theory
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Code of ethics / conduct
Conflicts of interest
Whistleblowing & retaliation
Utilitarianism (greatest good)
Rights-based ethics
Justice & fairness
Virtue ethics (character)
In Test mode, try assigning a primary principle to each scenario card and ask: “Which answer option best reflects this principle?”
Deep Flashcards • Definitions & Scenarios
Tap in Test Mode
What is business ethics?
Definition • Core concept
Business ethics is the application of moral principles and standards to business decisions, behavior, and policies. It asks whether actions are right or wrong, fair or unfair, beyond just “Is it legal?”
How is ethics different from law?
Definition • Comparison
Law sets minimum standards enforced by government and courts. Ethics is broader—it asks what is right, fair, and responsible, even when something may be legal but still harmful or unfair.
What is stakeholder theory?
Definition • Framework
Stakeholder theory says managers should consider the interests of all groups affected by a decision—employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, communities, regulators—rather than focusing only on shareholders.
Define corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Definition • CSR
CSR is the idea that businesses have duties beyond profit and compliance: to operate in ways that are socially responsible, environmentally sustainable, and beneficial (or at least not harmful) to society.
What is a conflict of interest?
Definition • Risk area
A conflict of interest occurs when an employee’s personal interests (financial, family, relationships) could improperly influence their professional judgment or decisions for the company.
What is whistleblowing?
Definition • Behavior
Whistleblowing is reporting suspected illegal, unethical, or unsafe practices to someone who can act—internally (supervisor, hotline) or externally (regulator, media) when internal channels fail or are unsafe.
Describe the utilitarian approach.
Framework • Consequences
The utilitarian approach looks at consequences and chooses the option that produces the greatest net benefit or least harm for the greatest number of people.
Describe the rights-based approach.
Framework • Rights
The rights approach asks whether a decision respects and protects fundamental rights (like privacy, safety, fair pay, non-discrimination) of each person, not just overall outcomes.
Describe the justice/fairness approach.
Framework • Fairness
The justice approach focuses on fairness: Are benefits and burdens distributed fairly? Are people treated equally unless there is a morally relevant reason to treat them differently?
Describe virtue ethics.
Framework • Character
Virtue ethics asks: “What would a person of good character do?” It emphasizes traits like honesty, courage, integrity, and responsibility, and aims for decisions that build those virtues.
Which framework fits: consistency & equal treatment?
Framework • Apply
That language points to the justice/fairness approach—consistent rules, equal treatment, and fair distribution of benefits and burdens.
Which framework fits: “most benefit, least harm”?
Framework • Apply
“Most benefit, least harm” is utilitarian thinking—comparing outcomes and choosing the option with the greatest net positive impact.
Scenario: Sales rep pressured to hide safety issues. Best first step?
Scenario • Safety & honesty
Recognize the conflict between sales pressure and duty to protect customers. The best first step is to raise the concern through an appropriate internal channel (supervisor, ethics hotline) and document the issue—upholding honesty and safety obligations.
Scenario: Manager wants to reward only top 5% with a policy change. Which principle is at risk?
Scenario • Fairness
The justice/fairness principle may be at risk if the policy unfairly disadvantages others without a clear, job-related reason. The manager should check whether rewards and opportunities are being distributed fairly.
Scenario: Layoffs vs. reduced hours. Which framework compares total impact on all groups?
Scenario • Utilitarian
The utilitarian approach fits best: compare overall harms and benefits (financial, emotional, community impact) of layoffs versus reduced hours and pick the option that minimizes total harm.
Scenario: Monitoring employee emails without notice. Which principle focuses on privacy concerns?
Scenario • Rights
The rights-based approach highlights privacy and respect for persons. Even if monitoring is legal, employees should be clearly informed and policies should balance security with reasonable expectations of privacy.
Scenario: Friend applies for a role you’re hiring for. What’s the key ethical risk?
Scenario • Conflict of interest
The main risk is a conflict of interest. The ethical response is to disclose the relationship, possibly recuse yourself from the decision, and ensure a fair, documented selection process.
Scenario: You discover data is being misreported to regulators. Which actions align with ethical duty?
Scenario • Whistleblowing
Correct answer choices will emphasize internal reporting to the appropriate level (compliance, ethics, leadership), refusing to participate in falsification, and escalating or external reporting if internal channels ignore serious violations.
Deep practice idea: in Test mode, pick a scenario card and say out loud: (1) stakeholders, (2) main principle, (3) best action. Then tap to reveal and compare.
OA Strategy • How to Approach Questions
Exam game plan
  • 1
    Identify the stakeholders.
    For each scenario, list who is affected: employees, customers, owners, community, regulators. Wrong answers often ignore a key stakeholder.
  • 2
    Name the principle in play.
    Ask: Is this about consequences (utilitarian), rights, fairness, character (virtue), or common good? Eliminate options that clearly violate that principle.
  • 3
    Spot red flags.
    “Everyone does it,” hiding information, lying, ignoring safety, retaliating against complaints—these are classic warning signs for wrong answer choices.
  • 4
    Choose the most ethical, not just the most convenient.
    Correct answers usually balance company needs with fairness, honesty, and long-term trust. They may require difficult but transparent actions.
Scenario Practice Prompt (Customize to Your World)
Apply to real work
Practice frame:
“A transportation/safety manager discovers that a terminal has been under-reporting minor incidents to look safer on metrics. What are the ethical issues? Who are the stakeholders? Which frameworks apply? What should the manager do and how should they communicate the decision?”
Re-use this frame to invent 2–3 more dilemmas based on your own experience. If you can walk through them calmly using ethics vocabulary, you’re building exactly what the OA is testing.